How do we learn from the network?

DOI: 10.59350/13fva-08521

·

Reda Sadki Avatar
By

Reda Sadki

Danger of death (Lars Plougmann/flickr.com)

When our organization’s hierarchy prohibits direct contact with the field, indirect and informal contact becomes more important than ever. Global and regional meetings, bilateral programmes, and various kinds of informal events provide opportunities for staying in touch. In fact, decentralization raises the stakes of informal and incidental learning – activities “flying under the radar” of decentralization’s hierarchical relationships may become the primary mode for learning about, with and for the field.

How do we overcome barriers to learning from the network? First, when we reframe new ideas and possibilities, we ask how this aligns with the current characteristics of the nodes in the network (“the membership”). Second, we need to leverage continual learning to innovate, recombining and inventing new solutions (knowledge brokering). Third, we need to consider indicators other than the volume of programming, and consider how we can scale up quality.

Photo: Danger of death (Lars Plougmann/flickr.com)

How to cite this article

As the primary source for this original work, this article is permanently archived with a DOI to meet rigorous standards of verification in the scholarly record. Please cite this stable reference to ensure ethical attribution of the theoretical concepts to their origin. Learn more

Reda Sadki (2015). How do we learn from the network?. Reda Sadki: Learning to make a difference. https://doi.org/10.59350/13fva-08521

Fediverse reactions

Discover more from Reda Sadki

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading